Frontegg
Frontegg · Ranked #8 of 8 in Authentication & Identity APIs
B2B user-management platform shipping multi-tenancy, admin portal, RBAC and audit logs in the SDK; self-serve with a 7,500-MAU free tier.
Multi-tenant B2B user management

Overview
Frontegg is a developer-first Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) platform, founded in 2021 in Israel and backed by roughly $70M from Insight Partners, Stripes and others. It targets B2B SaaS companies that need multi-tenant identity out of the box: every account is modeled as a tenant with its own users, roles, SSO connections, branding and security policies. Where Auth0 and Okta historically grew up around single-tenant or workforce use cases, Frontegg's core differentiator is that multi-tenancy, self-service admin portals, and per-tenant configuration are first-class primitives rather than bolt-ons. The product spans authentication (passwordless, social, MFA, SSO/SAML, M2M), authorization (RBAC, ReBAC, and entitlements/feature-gating tied to billing plans), pre-built and embeddable login boxes, customer-facing admin portals, and more recently an AI agent identity SDK.
The platform's strongest pull is time-to-value for engineering teams. Reviewers repeatedly describe it as plug-and-play, citing fast React/Angular/Next.js integration, a hosted login that can be stood up in hours, and responsive support (including a shared Slack channel) as the main reasons they chose it over building auth in-house. Frontegg pushes auth/authz checks to the edge for performance, and the entitlements engine that links feature access to subscription plans is unusually well-suited to SaaS monetization. G2 sentiment is strongly positive (about 4.8/5 across 360+ reviews), and the platform frequently wins head-to-head comparisons against Auth0/Okta on login UX, MFA and SAML setup.
The trade-offs are concentrated in flexibility and scale. The most common complaints are restricted customization of the hosted/embedded login UI for teams with very specific branding needs, limited webhook configurability, gaps in the tenant/user-management UI, an inability to bring your own user database, and documentation/API-coverage gaps that surface during deeper integrations. Some larger customers note that certain features feel tuned for smaller-scale deployments. Pricing is usage-based and starts free (Pay-as-you-go), but costs scale with MAUs, enterprise SSO/SCIM connections and M2M tokens, and the 99.99% uptime SLA, advanced fraud protection and multiple environments are gated behind custom-priced Enterprise. Net: an excellent fit for B2B SaaS teams that want production-grade multi-tenant identity quickly, with the caveat that highly bespoke UX or self-hosted-data requirements push you toward the Enterprise tier or a competitor.
How this score is derived
The APIbenchmarks Index is a weighted sum of four dimensions, each scored on an absolute 0–100 reference scale. See the methodology for every mapping.
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DXDeveloper docs at developers.frontegg.com cover quickstarts, API reference, and SDK guides, but reviewers repeatedly flag incomplete API coverage and onboarding gaps as the platform's most cited documentation weakness. | 78 | 30% | 23.4 |
| ReliabilityFrontegg publishes a public status page and offers a 99.99% uptime SLA on its Enterprise tier, though the status history shows periodic maintenance windows and 80+ recorded incidents over three years. | 75 | 25% | 18.8 |
| Ecosystem & SDKsOfficial SDKs span React, Angular, Vue, Next.js, Node.js, Python, plus Android/iOS and REST APIs/webhooks, giving broad coverage for modern web and mobile stacks. | 72 | 25% | 18.0 |
| AccessibilityA free Pay-as-you-go tier (7,500 MAUs, 5 SSO connections, unlimited orgs) and hosted login lower the barrier to entry, though advanced controls and SLA require sales-gated Enterprise. | 82 | 20% | 16.4 |
| APIbenchmarks Index (ABI) | 76.6 | ||
Table 1. Derivation of the ABI for Frontegg. Contribution = score × weight; the index is their sum.
At a glance
- Vendor
- Frontegg
- Pricing model
- MAU-based (+ feature add-ons)
- Free tier
- 7.5k MAU (free tier)
- Official SDKs
- 10 languages
Pricing
| Pay as You Go (PAYG) | $0/mo to start, usage-based | Hosted login, 7,500 monthly active users, 5 enterprise (SSO/SCIM) connections, unlimited organizations, custom domain; scales with extra users, connections and M2M tokens. |
| Enterprise | Custom (contact sales) | Everything in PAYG plus multiple environments, advanced fraud protection, 99.99% uptime SLA, premium support and add-ons. |
Key features
- •Multi-tenant identity (organizations/tenants) by design
- •Authentication: passwordless, social login, MFA, SSO/SAML, magic links
- •Authorization: RBAC, ReBAC, and entitlements/feature-gating
- •Self-service customer admin portal
- •Pre-built and embeddable login box (hosted OAuth2 or embedded via APIs)
- •Machine-to-machine (M2M) authentication and token issuance
- •SCIM provisioning and enterprise SSO connections
- •Edge-deployed auth/authz checks for performance
- •AI agent identity SDK for building authenticated AI agents
- •Webhooks and full REST API for custom flows
Official SDKs
Strengths & trade-offs
- +Multi-tenancy is a first-class primitive: per-tenant users, roles, SSO, branding and policies out of the box
- +Fast time-to-value; reviewers call it plug-and-play with hosted login live in hours
- +Entitlements engine ties feature-gating to subscription plans, well-suited to SaaS monetization
- +Responsive support, including shared Slack channels
- +Often beats Auth0/Okta in head-to-head reviews on login UX, MFA and SAML setup
- +Free Pay-as-you-go tier with a generous 7,500 MAU allowance and unlimited organizations
- –Limited customization of the hosted/embedded login UI for teams with strict branding needs
- –Cannot bring your own user database (no self-hosted data store)
- –Webhooks are not very customizable
- –Incomplete API documentation and occasionally unclear error messages
- –Tenant/user-management UI and provisioning flows have gaps
- –Some features feel better suited to smaller-scale deployments; 99.99% SLA gated behind Enterprise
What developers say
G2 4.8/5 (362 reviews)
Overwhelmingly positive, praised for fast integration, multi-tenancy and support, with recurring criticism of limited UI customization, webhook/API flexibility and documentation depth.
“Ease of integration of the Angular Frontegg library with our platform; it allowed us to focus on building our core product.”
Key figures
| Uptime SLA (Enterprise) | 99.99% | Frontegg pricing page ↗ |
| Free tier monthly active users | 7,500 MAUs | Frontegg pricing page ↗ |
| Free tier enterprise SSO/SCIM connections | 5 connections | Frontegg pricing page ↗ |
| Starting price (Pay as You Go) | $0/mo, usage-based | Frontegg pricing page ↗ |
| G2 aggregate rating | 4.8/5 across 362 reviews | G2 ↗ |
Compare Frontegg head to head
Sources
- https://frontegg.com/pricing
- https://frontegg.com/ciam
- https://developers.frontegg.com/ciam/sdks/overview
- https://developers.frontegg.com/ciam/api/overview
- https://status.frontegg.com/
- https://www.g2.com/products/frontegg/reviews
- https://www.capterra.com/p/206131/Frontegg/reviews/
- https://github.com/frontegg
- https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/frontegg
Figures last verified 2026-06-27. Spotted an error? corrections@apibenchmarks.com
