APIbenchmarks
Frontegg logo

Frontegg

Frontegg · Ranked #8 of 8 in Authentication & Identity APIs

76.6/ 100
BStrong

B2B user-management platform shipping multi-tenancy, admin portal, RBAC and audit logs in the SDK; self-serve with a 7,500-MAU free tier.

Best for

Multi-tenant B2B user management

Screenshot of Frontegg

Overview

Frontegg is a developer-first Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) platform, founded in 2021 in Israel and backed by roughly $70M from Insight Partners, Stripes and others. It targets B2B SaaS companies that need multi-tenant identity out of the box: every account is modeled as a tenant with its own users, roles, SSO connections, branding and security policies. Where Auth0 and Okta historically grew up around single-tenant or workforce use cases, Frontegg's core differentiator is that multi-tenancy, self-service admin portals, and per-tenant configuration are first-class primitives rather than bolt-ons. The product spans authentication (passwordless, social, MFA, SSO/SAML, M2M), authorization (RBAC, ReBAC, and entitlements/feature-gating tied to billing plans), pre-built and embeddable login boxes, customer-facing admin portals, and more recently an AI agent identity SDK.

The platform's strongest pull is time-to-value for engineering teams. Reviewers repeatedly describe it as plug-and-play, citing fast React/Angular/Next.js integration, a hosted login that can be stood up in hours, and responsive support (including a shared Slack channel) as the main reasons they chose it over building auth in-house. Frontegg pushes auth/authz checks to the edge for performance, and the entitlements engine that links feature access to subscription plans is unusually well-suited to SaaS monetization. G2 sentiment is strongly positive (about 4.8/5 across 360+ reviews), and the platform frequently wins head-to-head comparisons against Auth0/Okta on login UX, MFA and SAML setup.

The trade-offs are concentrated in flexibility and scale. The most common complaints are restricted customization of the hosted/embedded login UI for teams with very specific branding needs, limited webhook configurability, gaps in the tenant/user-management UI, an inability to bring your own user database, and documentation/API-coverage gaps that surface during deeper integrations. Some larger customers note that certain features feel tuned for smaller-scale deployments. Pricing is usage-based and starts free (Pay-as-you-go), but costs scale with MAUs, enterprise SSO/SCIM connections and M2M tokens, and the 99.99% uptime SLA, advanced fraud protection and multiple environments are gated behind custom-priced Enterprise. Net: an excellent fit for B2B SaaS teams that want production-grade multi-tenant identity quickly, with the caveat that highly bespoke UX or self-hosted-data requirements push you toward the Enterprise tier or a competitor.

How this score is derived

The APIbenchmarks Index is a weighted sum of four dimensions, each scored on an absolute 0–100 reference scale. See the methodology for every mapping.

DimensionScoreWeightContribution
Documentation & DXDeveloper docs at developers.frontegg.com cover quickstarts, API reference, and SDK guides, but reviewers repeatedly flag incomplete API coverage and onboarding gaps as the platform's most cited documentation weakness.
78
30%23.4
ReliabilityFrontegg publishes a public status page and offers a 99.99% uptime SLA on its Enterprise tier, though the status history shows periodic maintenance windows and 80+ recorded incidents over three years.
75
25%18.8
Ecosystem & SDKsOfficial SDKs span React, Angular, Vue, Next.js, Node.js, Python, plus Android/iOS and REST APIs/webhooks, giving broad coverage for modern web and mobile stacks.
72
25%18.0
AccessibilityA free Pay-as-you-go tier (7,500 MAUs, 5 SSO connections, unlimited orgs) and hosted login lower the barrier to entry, though advanced controls and SLA require sales-gated Enterprise.
82
20%16.4
APIbenchmarks Index (ABI)76.6

Table 1. Derivation of the ABI for Frontegg. Contribution = score × weight; the index is their sum.

At a glance

Vendor
Frontegg
Pricing model
MAU-based (+ feature add-ons)
Free tier
7.5k MAU (free tier)
Official SDKs
10 languages

Pricing

Pay as You Go (PAYG)$0/mo to start, usage-basedHosted login, 7,500 monthly active users, 5 enterprise (SSO/SCIM) connections, unlimited organizations, custom domain; scales with extra users, connections and M2M tokens.
EnterpriseCustom (contact sales)Everything in PAYG plus multiple environments, advanced fraud protection, 99.99% uptime SLA, premium support and add-ons.

Key features

  • Multi-tenant identity (organizations/tenants) by design
  • Authentication: passwordless, social login, MFA, SSO/SAML, magic links
  • Authorization: RBAC, ReBAC, and entitlements/feature-gating
  • Self-service customer admin portal
  • Pre-built and embeddable login box (hosted OAuth2 or embedded via APIs)
  • Machine-to-machine (M2M) authentication and token issuance
  • SCIM provisioning and enterprise SSO connections
  • Edge-deployed auth/authz checks for performance
  • AI agent identity SDK for building authenticated AI agents
  • Webhooks and full REST API for custom flows

Official SDKs

ReactAngularVueNext.jsNode.js / JavaScriptPythonAndroidiOSREST APIWebhooks

Strengths & trade-offs

Strengths
  • +Multi-tenancy is a first-class primitive: per-tenant users, roles, SSO, branding and policies out of the box
  • +Fast time-to-value; reviewers call it plug-and-play with hosted login live in hours
  • +Entitlements engine ties feature-gating to subscription plans, well-suited to SaaS monetization
  • +Responsive support, including shared Slack channels
  • +Often beats Auth0/Okta in head-to-head reviews on login UX, MFA and SAML setup
  • +Free Pay-as-you-go tier with a generous 7,500 MAU allowance and unlimited organizations
Trade-offs
  • Limited customization of the hosted/embedded login UI for teams with strict branding needs
  • Cannot bring your own user database (no self-hosted data store)
  • Webhooks are not very customizable
  • Incomplete API documentation and occasionally unclear error messages
  • Tenant/user-management UI and provisioning flows have gaps
  • Some features feel better suited to smaller-scale deployments; 99.99% SLA gated behind Enterprise

What developers say

G2 4.8/5 (362 reviews)

Overwhelmingly positive, praised for fast integration, multi-tenancy and support, with recurring criticism of limited UI customization, webhook/API flexibility and documentation depth.

Ease of integration of the Angular Frontegg library with our platform; it allowed us to focus on building our core product.

Key figures

Uptime SLA (Enterprise)99.99%Frontegg pricing page
Free tier monthly active users7,500 MAUsFrontegg pricing page
Free tier enterprise SSO/SCIM connections5 connectionsFrontegg pricing page
Starting price (Pay as You Go)$0/mo, usage-basedFrontegg pricing page
G2 aggregate rating4.8/5 across 362 reviewsG2

Compare Frontegg head to head

Sources

  1. https://frontegg.com/pricing
  2. https://frontegg.com/ciam
  3. https://developers.frontegg.com/ciam/sdks/overview
  4. https://developers.frontegg.com/ciam/api/overview
  5. https://status.frontegg.com/
  6. https://www.g2.com/products/frontegg/reviews
  7. https://www.capterra.com/p/206131/Frontegg/reviews/
  8. https://github.com/frontegg
  9. https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/frontegg

Figures last verified 2026-06-27. Spotted an error? corrections@apibenchmarks.com