Head to head
ConfigCat vs Split
As a feature flag API, ConfigCat rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 83.2 to 81.1, a 2.1-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | ConfigCat | Split |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 83.2 | 81.1 |
Specifications
| ConfigCat | Split | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Simple flat-priced feature flags for any team size | Feature management + experimentation (Harness FME) |
| Free tier | Free: 10 flags, unlimited seats, unlimited flag reads | Free Developer tier: up to 10 seats, 50 feature flags |
| Pricing | Flat tier (config fetches) | Per-seat (usage-based at scale) |
| Official SDKs | 12 languages | 12 languages |
Is ConfigCat better than Split?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, ConfigCat rates higher (83.2 vs 81.1). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.