Head to head
Crustdata vs Pearch
As a ai candidate sourcing tools API, Crustdata rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 95.7 to 62.6, a 33.1-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
62.6ABI / 100
HR-tech builders and agents that need natural-language candidate search with optional email/phone enrichment, billed in credits
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Crustdata | Pearch |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 95.7 | 62.6 |
Specifications
| Crustdata | Pearch | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Real-time data for AI agents and sourcing | HR-tech builders and agents that need natural-language candidate search with optional email/phone enrichment, billed in credits |
| Free tier | Free trial credits + free-forever tier | No |
| Pricing | Per credit (additive) | Prepaid credit packs; per-search and per-enrichment credits |
| Official SDKs | 5 languages | 3 languages |
Is Crustdata better than Pearch?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Crustdata rates higher (95.7 vs 62.6). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.
Verdict in one line
Crustdata leads by 33.1 points (95.7 vs 62.6) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.
Winner by criterion
| Criterion | Winner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | 96 | 66 | |
| Reliability | 95 | 55 | |
| Ecosystem & SDKs | 95 | 62 | |
| Accessibility | 97 | 68 |
Choose Crustdata if… / choose Pearch if…
- →documentation & dx matters most to you (96 vs 66)
- →reliability matters most to you (95 vs 55)
- →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (95 vs 62)
- →accessibility matters most to you (97 vs 68)
- →you want a free tier to start (Free trial credits + free-forever tier)
- →you need broad SDK coverage (5 official SDKs vs 3)
- →your use case matches its focus: real-time data for ai agents and sourcing
- →your use case matches its focus: hr-tech builders and agents that need natural-language candidate search with optional email/phone enrichment, billed in credits
Pricing side by side
- Model
- Per credit (additive)
- Free tier
- Free trial credits + free-forever tier
- Free tier$0/mo
- Real-time API AccessCredit-based / not publicly listed
- Flat File DatasetsCustom
- EnterpriseCustom (contact sales)
- Model
- Prepaid credit packs; per-search and per-enrichment credits
- Free tier
- No
- First purchase offer$300
- Standard$600
- Startup$1,500
- Growth$3,000
- Enterprise / annualCustom
Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Crustdata) and 2026-10-22 (Pearch).
SDK and language coverage
Both · 1
REST API (HTTP, primary interface)
Only Crustdata · 4
Official MCP server (Model Context Protocol)crustdata-mcp (community pip package)crustdata-screener-mcp (community package)Composio toolkit (Claude Code, Vercel AI SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK, Mastra AI)
Only Pearch · 2
MCP server (remote, OAuth or Bearer key; MIT)MCP local stdio (Python, fastmcp)
Strengths and weaknesses
- +Genuine real-time / live web indexing, returns data for untracked companies within minutes rather than serving stale batch data
- +Watcher API + webhooks push change signals (job changes, funding, promotions) the moment they're detected
- +Clean, fast, well-documented REST API that reviewers say makes integration 'almost effortless'
- –Paid plan pricing is opaque, no named tiers or list prices published; heavier endpoints gated behind enterprise/demo requests
- –Credit-based model can create unpredictable costs without active monitoring
- –No first-party SDKs, integration is raw REST (client libraries are community/third-party only)
- +Official remote MCP server (MIT) with OAuth or API key
- +Published credit packs and per-feature credit costs
- +Real-time profile and contact enrichment options
- –No free trial without contacting sales
- –$300 minimum purchase
- –docs.pearch.ai not retrievable and third-party prices disagree
Crustdata vs Pearch: questions
- Which has better documentation, Crustdata or Pearch?
- Crustdata scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 96 vs 66 out of 100.
- Which is more reliable, Crustdata or Pearch?
- Crustdata scores higher on reliability: 95 vs 55 out of 100.
- Do Crustdata and Pearch have a free tier?
- Crustdata: yes (Free trial credits + free-forever tier). Pearch: no free tier.
- How are Crustdata and Pearch priced?
- Crustdata: Per credit (additive). Pearch: Prepaid credit packs; per-search and per-enrichment credits.
- Which has more official SDKs?
- Crustdata lists 5 official SDKs, Pearch lists 3.