Head to head

Apollo.io vs Pearch

As a ai candidate sourcing tools API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 62.6, a 17.5-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.

Apollo.io logo
Apollo.io
Apollo.io
B
80.1ABI / 100

Sales engagement plus enrichment

Pearch logo
Pearch
Pearch.ai
D
62.6ABI / 100

HR-tech builders and agents that need natural-language candidate search with optional email/phone enrichment, billed in credits

Criterion by criterion

CriterionApollo.ioPearch
Documentation & DX
80
66
Reliability
84
55
Ecosystem & SDKs
78
62
Accessibility
78
68
APIbenchmarks Index80.162.6

Specifications

Apollo.ioPearch
Best forSales engagement plus enrichmentHR-tech builders and agents that need natural-language candidate search with optional email/phone enrichment, billed in credits
Free tier10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/moNo
PricingPer credit (email 1, phone 8)Prepaid credit packs; per-search and per-enrichment credits
Official SDKs6 languages3 languages

Is Apollo.io better than Pearch?

On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 62.6). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.

Verdict in one line

Apollo.io leads by 17.5 points (80.1 vs 62.6) and wins 4 of 4 criteria.

Winner by criterion

CriterionApollo.io logoApollo.ioPearch logoPearchWinner
Documentation & DX8066Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Reliability8455Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Ecosystem & SDKs7862Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Accessibility7868Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Apollo.io vs Pearch API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 62.6; documentation & dx 80 vs 66, reliability 84 vs 55, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 62, accessibility 78 vs 68.
Apollo.io vs Pearch API comparison: ABI 80.1 vs 62.6; documentation & dx 80 vs 66, reliability 84 vs 55, ecosystem & sdks 78 vs 62, accessibility 78 vs 68.

Choose Apollo.io if… / choose Pearch if…

Apollo.io logoChoose Apollo.io if
  • →documentation & dx matters most to you (80 vs 66)
  • →reliability matters most to you (84 vs 55)
  • →ecosystem & sdks matters most to you (78 vs 62)
  • →accessibility matters most to you (78 vs 68)
  • →you want a free tier to start (10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo)
  • →you need broad SDK coverage (6 official SDKs vs 3)
  • →your use case matches its focus: sales engagement plus enrichment
Pearch logoChoose Pearch if
  • →your use case matches its focus: hr-tech builders and agents that need natural-language candidate search with optional email/phone enrichment, billed in credits

Pricing side by side

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
Model
Per credit (email 1, phone 8)
Free tier
10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo
  • Free$0
  • Basic$49/user/mo (annual)
  • Professional$79/user/mo (annual)
  • Organization$119/user/mo (annual)
  • Overage credits$0.20 / credit
Pearch logoPearch
Model
Prepaid credit packs; per-search and per-enrichment credits
Free tier
No
  • First purchase offer$300
  • Standard$600
  • Startup$1,500
  • Growth$3,000
  • Enterprise / annualCustom

Vendor-published pricing, verified 2026-06-27 (Apollo.io) and 2026-10-22 (Pearch).

SDK and language coverage

Both · 1
REST API (HTTPS / JSON)
Only Apollo.io · 5
OpenAPI / Swagger specificationApollo MCP serverApollo CLIllms.txt index for AI agentsCommunity-built clients (e.g. Ruby gem EnaiaInc/apollo_io), no official first-party language SDKs
Only Pearch · 2
MCP server (remote, OAuth or Bearer key; MIT)MCP local stdio (Python, fastmcp)

Strengths and weaknesses

Apollo.io logoApollo.io
  • +Large database (275M+ contacts, 73M+ companies) with strong US coverage (~80–88% match accuracy)
  • +Aggressive pricing that undercuts ZoomInfo/Lusha-class incumbents for comparable breadth
  • +Bulk enrichment endpoints (up to 10 people or companies per call) reduce call volume
  • –Data accuracy drops sharply outside the US (~60–73% in EU/APAC/LATAM); stale titles common
  • –Phone numbers cost 8 credits each yet user-reported direct-dial accuracy is only ~50–70%
  • –Credits expire every billing cycle with no rollover and no refund on unused balance
Pearch logoPearch
  • +Official remote MCP server (MIT) with OAuth or API key
  • +Published credit packs and per-feature credit costs
  • +Real-time profile and contact enrichment options
  • –No free trial without contacting sales
  • –$300 minimum purchase
  • –docs.pearch.ai not retrievable and third-party prices disagree

Apollo.io vs Pearch: questions

Which has better documentation, Apollo.io or Pearch?
Apollo.io scores higher on documentation and developer experience: 80 vs 66 out of 100.
Which is more reliable, Apollo.io or Pearch?
Apollo.io scores higher on reliability: 84 vs 55 out of 100.
Do Apollo.io and Pearch have a free tier?
Apollo.io: yes (10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo). Pearch: no free tier.
How are Apollo.io and Pearch priced?
Apollo.io: Per credit (email 1, phone 8). Pearch: Prepaid credit packs; per-search and per-enrichment credits.
Which has more official SDKs?
Apollo.io lists 6 official SDKs, Pearch lists 3.

Other AI Candidate Sourcing Tools comparisons