Head to head
Stytch vs Supabase Auth
As a authentication & identity API, Stytch rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 82.3 to 82.2, a 0.1-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Stytch | Supabase Auth |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 82.3 | 82.2 |
Specifications
| Stytch | Supabase Auth | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Passwordless & B2B auth, no feature gates | Postgres-native auth in an OSS BaaS |
| Free tier | 10k MAU + 5 SSO/SCIM connections | 50k MAU (Free plan) |
| Pricing | Usage-based (MAU + connections) | MAU-based (+ platform fee) |
| Official SDKs | 9 languages | 6 languages |
Is Stytch better than Supabase Auth?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Stytch rates higher (82.3 vs 82.2). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.