Head to head
Supabase Auth vs WorkOS
As a authentication & identity API, WorkOS rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 86.5 to 82.2, a 4.3-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Supabase Auth | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 82.2 | 86.5 |
Specifications
| Supabase Auth | WorkOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Postgres-native auth in an OSS BaaS | Enterprise SSO & SCIM for B2B |
| Free tier | 50k MAU (Free plan) | Up to 1M MAU on AuthKit; $125/connection for SSO/SCIM |
| Pricing | MAU-based (+ platform fee) | Per connection / MAU-based |
| Official SDKs | 6 languages | 12 languages |
Is Supabase Auth better than WorkOS?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, WorkOS rates higher (86.5 vs 82.2). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.