Head to head
Apollo.io vs Hunter
As a data enrichment API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 78.9, a 1.2-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Apollo.io | Hunter |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 80.1 | 78.9 |
Specifications
| Apollo.io | Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Sales engagement plus enrichment | Email finding and verification for outreach |
| Free tier | 10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo | 50 credits/mo, API included |
| Pricing | Per credit (email 1, phone 8) | Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification) |
| Official SDKs | 6 languages | 4 languages |
Is Apollo.io better than Hunter?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 78.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.