Head to head
Apollo.io vs Clay
As a data enrichment API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 66.9, a 13.2-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Apollo.io | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 80.1 | 66.9 |
Specifications
| Apollo.io | Clay | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Sales engagement plus enrichment | Multi-provider enrichment orchestration |
| Free tier | 10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo | Free plan with limited credits (no card) |
| Pricing | Per credit (email 1, phone 8) | Data Credits + Actions |
| Official SDKs | 6 languages | 1 languages |
Is Apollo.io better than Clay?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 66.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.