Head to head
Apollo.io vs FullEnrich
As a data enrichment API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 72.5, a 7.6-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Apollo.io | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 80.1 | 72.5 |
Specifications
| Apollo.io | FullEnrich | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Sales engagement plus enrichment | Waterfall email and mobile enrichment |
| Free tier | 10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo | 50 free trial credits, no card |
| Pricing | Per credit (email 1, phone 8) | Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10) |
| Official SDKs | 6 languages | 5 languages |
Is Apollo.io better than FullEnrich?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 72.5). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.