FullEnrich
FullEnrich · Ranked #9 of 19 in Data Enrichment APIs
Waterfall enrichment API across 20+ providers with webhook delivery, v1/v2 OpenAPI specs, an MCP server and a 50-credit no-card trial, but no SDKs, a mixed status record and a weak Trustpilot score.
Waterfall email and mobile enrichment
Overview
FullEnrich is an enrichment-only product that cascades across 20+ (pricing page says 25+) data providers and returns the first verified email or mobile. Its API covers bulk Enrich (with webhook delivery recommended), Reverse Email Lookup, Search People and Search Company (30+ filters), Look Up People and Company, credit balance and API-key validation, with legacy v1 endpoints kept alongside v2. Docs are hosted on Mintlify with an llms.txt index, OpenAPI specs for both versions, an MCP server via the help centre, and dedicated pages on webhooks, credits and testing tips, email verification statuses, a data dictionary, rate limits, production deployment and quality-over-speed guidance.
Pricing is public and success-based: a work email costs 1 credit, a personal email 3, a verified mobile 10, reverse lookup 1, and profile/company data is free with enrichment (0.25 credit standalone). All plans include API, MCP and unlimited seats; the free trial gives 50 credits with no card. Paid pricing figures differ between sources (the official page extraction showed a Pro tier with 1,000 credits and 3-month rollover, third parties cite about $29 for 500 credits and $55 for 1,000), so exact monthly prices are flagged as unconfirmed here.
Gaps: no official SDKs; the rate-limit page content could not be extracted so numeric limits are unverified; reliability evidence is mixed (status.fullenrich.com exists, Pingoru logged 5 incidents and 97.78% uptime over 90 days, and StatusGator shows reports of API enrichments hanging). Sentiment diverges: G2 4.8/5 (166 reviews) praises accuracy, while Trustpilot is 2.1/5 on only 21 reviews, mostly allegations that personal phone numbers were used without consent.
How this score is derived
The APIbenchmarks Index is a weighted sum of four dimensions, each scored on an absolute 0–100 reference scale. See the methodology for every mapping.
| Dimension | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DXMintlify-hosted docs with llms.txt, v1 and v2 OpenAPI specs, webhook guidance, credit and testing tips, a data dictionary, search filter references and production-deployment guides; numeric rate limits could not be confirmed. | 80 | 30% | 24.0 |
| ReliabilityAn official status page exists (status.fullenrich.com) but Pingoru recorded 5 incidents and 97.78% uptime over 90 days, and StatusGator shows reports of API enrichments stuck or hanging; no SLA was found, so scored below PDL. | 66 | 25% | 16.5 |
| Ecosystem & SDKsAn MCP server, Clay, HubSpot, Zapier, Make and n8n integrations and webhooks give strong no-code reach, but no official SDKs were found and the product is enrichment-only. | 64 | 25% | 16.0 |
| AccessibilityA 50-credit trial with no card, API and MCP on all plans, public success-based credit costs and unlimited seats make onboarding easy; paid price points were inconsistent between sources and Trustpilot shows 2.1/5, so held below PDL. | 80 | 20% | 16.0 |
| APIbenchmarks Index (ABI) | 72.5 | ||
Table 1. Derivation of the ABI for FullEnrich. Contribution = score × weight; the index is their sum.
At a glance
- Vendor
- FullEnrich
- Pricing model
- Per successful result (email 1, mobile 10)
- Free tier
- 50 free trial credits, no card
- Official SDKs
- 5 languages
Pricing
| Free trial | $0 | 50 credits, no card; unlimited users. |
| Starter / Pro | About $29-$55/mo (third-party figures) | 500-1,000 credits/month; credits roll over (official page cites 3-month rollover). |
| Enterprise | Custom | Priority support, dedicated manager, SSO and reseller options. |
Key features
- •Bulk Enrich API (async, webhook or poll)
- •Reverse Email Lookup
- •Search People and Search Company (30+ filters)
- •Look Up People and Company
- •Credit balance and API-key validity endpoints
- •Email verification statuses and data dictionary
- •Waterfall across 20+ sources
- •MCP server
- •OpenAPI v1 and v2
Official SDKs
Strengths & trade-offs
- +Waterfall across 20+ providers with success-based billing
- +Webhook delivery recommended, plus polling for results
- +v1 and v2 OpenAPI specs and an llms.txt docs index
- +API, MCP server and unlimited seats on all plans
- +50 free trial credits, no card required
- +SOC 2 Type II and GDPR/CCPA compliance stated; G2 4.8/5
- –No official SDKs found
- –Mobile reveals cost 10 credits and personal emails 3
- –Enrichment-only: no signals, outreach or native CRM breadth
- –Third-party monitors show 5 incidents in 90 days and hanging enrichments
- –Trustpilot 2.1/5 on 21 reviews with consent allegations
- –Paid price points inconsistent across sources
What developers say
G2 4.8/5 (166 reviews); Trustpilot 2.1/5 (21 reviews)
G2 reviewers praise accuracy and ease of use; Trustpilot reviewers allege personal phone numbers were used without consent and say the vendor does not respond.
“G2 reviewers note almost always correct email addresses, good performance and affordable pricing (paraphrased).”
Key figures
| Waterfall coverage | 20+ providers (pricing page: 25+) | FullEnrich pricing and third-party ↗ |
| Average find rate (vendor claim) | ~80% | FullEnrich pricing page ↗ |
| Credit cost | Work email 1, personal email 3, mobile 10 | FullEnrich pricing page ↗ |
| 90-day uptime (third party) | 97.78%, 5 incidents | Pingoru ↗ |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 (166 reviews) | G2 ↗ |
| Trustpilot | 2.1/5 (21 reviews) | Trustpilot ↗ |
Compare FullEnrich head to head
Sources
- https://docs.fullenrich.com
- https://docs.fullenrich.com/llms.txt
- https://fullenrich.com/pricing
- https://status.fullenrich.com
- https://pingoru.io/providers/fullenrich
- https://statusgator.com/services/fullenrich
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/fullenrich.com
- https://g2.com/products/fullenrich/reviews_and_filters?page=4
- https://syncgtm.com/blog/fullenrich-review
- https://tomba.io/blog/fullenrich-pricing
Figures last verified 2026-10-07. Spotted an error? corrections@apibenchmarks.com