Head to head
Apollo.io vs Lusha
As a data enrichment API, Apollo.io rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 80.1 to 73.7, a 6.4-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Apollo.io | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 80.1 | 73.7 |
Specifications
| Apollo.io | Lusha | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Sales engagement plus enrichment | Contact reveal inside sales workflows |
| Free tier | 10k credits/mo (verified corporate domain) or 100/mo | 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap) |
| Pricing | Per credit (email 1, phone 8) | Per credit (email 1, phone 5) |
| Official SDKs | 6 languages | 5 languages |
Is Apollo.io better than Lusha?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Apollo.io rates higher (80.1 vs 73.7). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.