Head to head
FullContact vs Hunter
As a data enrichment API, Hunter rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 78.9 to 68.4, a 10.5-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | FullContact | Hunter |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 68.4 | 78.9 |
Specifications
| FullContact | Hunter | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Identity resolution / Identity Graph | Email finding and verification for outreach |
| Free tier | 100 API calls/mo (Developer plan) | 50 credits/mo, API included |
| Pricing | Per matched API call | Per credit (1 per email found, 0.5 per verification) |
| Official SDKs | 7 languages | 4 languages |
Is FullContact better than Hunter?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Hunter rates higher (78.9 vs 68.4). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.