Head to head
Pinecone vs Turbopuffer
As a vector database API, Pinecone rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 87.5 to 67.7, a 19.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Pinecone | Turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 87.5 | 67.7 |
Specifications
| Pinecone | Turbopuffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Serverless vector search for production RAG | Cheap serverless search on object storage |
| Free tier | Starter: 2GB storage (~350K vectors), 1 index, no SLA | No |
| Pricing | Per read/write unit + storage | Per GB queried/written + storage |
| Official SDKs | 7 languages | 6 languages |
Is Pinecone better than Turbopuffer?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Pinecone rates higher (87.5 vs 67.7). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.