Head to head
Turbopuffer vs Zilliz Cloud (Milvus)
As a vector database API, Zilliz Cloud (Milvus) rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 85.4 to 67.7, a 17.7-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Turbopuffer | Zilliz Cloud (Milvus) |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 67.7 | 85.4 |
Specifications
| Turbopuffer | Zilliz Cloud (Milvus) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Cheap serverless search on object storage | Managed Milvus at billion-vector scale |
| Free tier | No | 5GB storage + compute credits, permanent free tier |
| Pricing | Per GB queried/written + storage | Per compute-unit-hour + storage |
| Official SDKs | 6 languages | 9 languages |
Is Turbopuffer better than Zilliz Cloud (Milvus)?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Zilliz Cloud (Milvus) rates higher (85.4 vs 67.7). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.