Head to head
Supabase Vector (pgvector) vs Turbopuffer
As a vector database API, Supabase Vector (pgvector) rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 85.2 to 67.7, a 17.5-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Supabase Vector (pgvector) | Turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 85.2 | 67.7 |
Specifications
| Supabase Vector (pgvector) | Turbopuffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Postgres-native embeddings, no separate service | Cheap serverless search on object storage |
| Free tier | Free project: 500MB DB, pgvector included | No |
| Pricing | Bundled in Postgres plan (storage-based) | Per GB queried/written + storage |
| Official SDKs | 7 languages | 6 languages |
Is Supabase Vector (pgvector) better than Turbopuffer?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Supabase Vector (pgvector) rates higher (85.2 vs 67.7). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.