Head to head
Clay vs Lusha
As a data enrichment API, Lusha rates higher on the APIbenchmarks Index, 73.7 to 66.9, a 6.8-point gap. Here is how they compare on each criterion.
Criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Clay | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation & DX | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Ecosystem & SDKs | ||
| Accessibility | ||
| APIbenchmarks Index | 66.9 | 73.7 |
Specifications
| Clay | Lusha | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Multi-provider enrichment orchestration | Contact reveal inside sales workflows |
| Free tier | Free plan with limited credits (no card) | 40 credits/mo (API key on every plan, 100 req/day cap) |
| Pricing | Data Credits + Actions | Per credit (email 1, phone 5) |
| Official SDKs | 1 languages | 5 languages |
Is Clay better than Lusha?
On the APIbenchmarks Index, Lusha rates higher (73.7 vs 66.9). It leads on the four weighted criteria, but price is reported separately, so the best choice still depends on your budget.